Firefighters Procedural Bill of Rights Act of 2007
If you are a firefighter under investigation by the California Emergency Medical Services Authority
or a local EMS agency, you have additional procedural protections under the California Firefighters Procedural Bill of Rights Act
. Professional license defense attorneys
at Rose Law are experts in the Firefighters Bill of Rights Act and applying this law to help defend your EMS license from revocation, suspension, surrender, or other discipline.
In 2007, the California Legislature adopted Assembly Bill 220 enacting the Firefighters Procedural Bills of Rights Act (“FBOR”), which guarantees various rights to firefighters. The FBOR is codified at Government Code sections 3250 – 3262 and establishes specific requirements for administrative investigations and discipline of firefighters.
The FBOR is largely modeled on the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (“POBR”), which is codified at Government Code sections 3300-3312 and was first enacted over 30 years ago in 1976. The Legislative Counsel’s Digest for Assembly Bill 220 speaks to the relatedness between the PBOR and the FBOR by expressly referencing the PBOR in its opening paragraph.
The FBOR establishes, with certain exceptions, a one-year period of limitations within which an employing fire department must complete its investigation of any act, omission, or other allegation of misconduct and notify the firefighter of its proposed disciplinary action. (Gov. Code § 3254(d).) Tolling of the one-year period of limitations established by the FBOR may occur in seven distinct circumstances. These are: (i) a voluntary written waiver by the firefighter tolling the limitations period; (ii) the act, omission, or other allegation of misconduct is also the subject of a criminal investigation or criminal prosecution; (iii) the investigation is a multijurisdictional investigation that requires a reasonable extension for coordination of the agencies involved; (iv) the investigation involves an employee who is incapacitated or otherwise unavailable; (v) the investigation involves a matter in civil litigation where the firefighter is named as a party defendant; (vi) the investigation involves a matter in criminal litigation in which the complainant is a criminal defendant; and (v) the investigation involves an allegation of workers’ compensation fraud on the part of the firefighter. (Gov. Code § 3254(d).)
In addition to the one-year period of limitations, the FBOR prohibits under Government Code section 3258 an employing fire department from requiring or requesting for purposes of job assignment or personnel action disclosure of “any item of [a firefighter’s] property, income, assets, source of income, debts, or personal or domestic expenditures, including those of any member of his or her family or household, unless that information is otherwise required to be furnished under state law or obtained pursuant to court order.”
As well, the FBOR requires under Government Code section 3254.5 that an employing fire department’s administrative appeals procedure for its firefighters conform to portions of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) beginning at Government Code section 11500 et seq.
The rights and protections of the FBOR apply to a firefighter during events and circumstances involving the performance of his or her official duties.
The FBOR makes unlawful at Government Code section 3260, subpart (a), the denial or refusal to any firefighter the rights and protections guaranteed by the FBOR.
The FBOR provides at Government Code section 3260, subdivision (b), “[t]he superior court shall have initial jurisdiction over any proceeding brought by any firefighter against any employing department or licensing or certifying agency for alleged violations of [the FBOR].” Upon a finding by the superior court that a fire department, its employees, agents, or assigns, maliciously violated the FBOR with the intent to injure, the FBOR authorizes at Government code section 3260, subpart (d), imposition of a twenty-five thousand dollar ($25,000) civil penalty for each and every violation and for reasonable attorney’s fees.
Legislative Developments Since the Passage of the Act
On September 30, 2010, Governor Schwarzenegger signed Assembly Bill 2331 into law, which amends the Firefighters Procedural Bill of Rights Act to permit appeals procedures that are agreed upon between labor organizations and fire agencies as a part of the collective bargaining process.
Under existing law, appeals procedures for California firefighters must conform to provisions of the California Administrative Procedures Act (APA) beginning at Government Code section 11500. The APA mandates a hearing before a quorum of the governing body of the administrative agency or an administrative law judge (ALJ), specifies certain notice requirements, provides for some prehearing discovery, and specifies many other procedural rules. Many existing grievance arbitration and disciplinary appeals procedures contained in memorandums of understanding and collective bargaining agreements between firefighter union locals or associations and fire departments do not meet these requirements, but are nonetheless considered sufficiently protective of firefighter rights by both labor and management. For example, final and binding private arbitration does not necessarily conform to all requirements of the APA, but is generally viewed as procedurally adequate.
Under AB 2331, beginning January 1, 2011, appeals procedures that are mutually agreed upon as a part of the labor-management negotiations process but do not necessarily conform the APA are still considered legally sufficient under the FBOR.
This legislation amending the firefighter appeals procedure requirements contained in the FBOR was sponsored by the California Professional Firefighters (CPF).California Emergency Medical Services Authority